Skip to main content
Log in

Isolated wetlands: State-of-the-science and future directions

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (SWANCC), the U.S. Supreme Court held that isolated, intrastate, non-navigable waters could not be protected under the Clean Water Act based solely on their use by migratory birds. The SWANCC decision has created a need to compile and make available scientific information for post-SWANCC policy development. In response, this article reviews the state of our scientific understanding of isolated wetlands, based on the major findings of papers contributed to this special issue of Wetlands. Because the term “isolated wetland” has not been used consistently in the scientific literature, we recommend that geographically isolated wetlands be defined as “wetlands that are completely surrounded by upland,” as proposed by Tiner, for the purposes of scientific studies. Geographically isolated wetlands are not homogeneous but have a broad range of functional response, partly due to their occurrence over a wide range of climatic and geologic settings. One major question addressed through this special issue is the role that isolation plays in the function of geographically isolated wetlands. It appears that isolation is not a primary factor and that many of the functions performed by isolated wetlands are also performed by non-isolated wetlands and non-wetland ecosystems. Variability in moisture conditions plays an important role in the function of many geographically isolated wetlands. However, hydrologic isolation may affect moisture conditions, and biotic isolation could be important for certain populations. Depending on the factor being considered, geographically isolated wetlands are not entirely isolated but are better viewed as occurring within an isolation-connectivity continuum that has both hydrologic and biotic expressions. The juxtaposition of isolation and connectivity occurring in geographically isolated wetlands may represent a semi-isolated state that uniquely shapes these wetlands and their functions. Comprehensive data, designating the number, total area, and functional classification of isolated wetlands, would provide the foundation for monitoring impacts to isolated wetlands. Studies are needed to examine and quantify how isolated wetlands, wetland complexes, and other potentially impacted waters contribute hydrologically, chemically, and biologically to waters of the U.S. Methods to assess and map the degree of connectivity between geographically isolated wetlands and waters of the U.S., based on ground-water travel time, recurrence frequency of intermittent surface-water connections, and home ranges of species that require both types of waters, could be useful for regulators. Whatever policies are developed, scientific input and technical information will continue to play a crucial role in the policy and regulatory arena. Maintaining and enhancing the dialogue among wetland scientists, policy-makers, and regulators will ensure that critical information is developed and communicated and also continue to invigorate wetland science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abbruzzese, B. and S. G. Leibowitz 1997. A synoptic approach for assessing cumulative impacts to wetlands. Environmental Management 21:457–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, A. C. 1999. Climate change in North Dakota since the last glaciation—review of the paleontological record. Proceedings of the North Dakota Academy of Science 53:171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt, K. J. and G. W. Tanner. 2000. Use of temporary wetlands by anurans in a hydrologically modified landscape. Wetlands 20:313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batt, B. D. J., M. G. Anderson, C. D. Anderson, and F. D. Caswell. 1989. The use of prairie potholes by North American ducks. p. 204–227. In A. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, B. L. 1996. The need to define hydrologic equivalence at the landscape scale for freshwater wetland mitigation. Ecological Applications 6:57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, B. L. 1999. Cumulative effects on wetland landscapes: to wetland restoration in the United States and southern Canada. Wetlands 19:775–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, B. L. and K. S. Godwin. 2003. Fens of the United States: distribution, characteristics, and scientific connection versus legal isolation. Wetlands 23:608–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolen, E. G., L. M. Smith, and H. L. Schramm, Jr. 1989. Playa lakes: prairie wetlands of the southern high plains. BioScience 39:615–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, M. M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Wetlands Research Program, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report WRP-DE-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, J. and S. Hausmann. 2003. Various state reactions to the SWANCC decision. Wetlands 23:653–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. J. 2001. Temporary hydrologic connections make “isolated” wetlands function at the landscape scale. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. E. 1990. Wetlands losses in the United States 1780’s to 1980’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

  • Downing, D. M., C. Winer, and L. D. Wood. 2003. Navigating through Clean Water Act jurisdiction: a legal review. Wetlands 23:475–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L. and R. R. Sharitz. 2000. Population genetics of two rare perennials in isolated wetlands: Sagittaria isoetiformis and S. teres (Alismataceae). American Journal of Botany 87:1147–1158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch, S. M. and A. G. van der Valk. 1996. Vegetation and environmental conditions in recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region of the USA. Vegetatio 126:89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. W. 2003. Terrestrial habitat: a vital component for herpetofauna of isolated wetlands. Wetlands 23:630–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godt, M. J. W., J. L. Hamrick, and S. Bratton. 1995. Genetic diversity in a threatened wetland species, Helonias bullata (Liliaceae). Conservation Biology 9:596–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan, C. T. and H. P. Johnson. 1968. Hydraulic model of runoff from depressional areas, I: General considerations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 11:364–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J. 2001. The end of the Migratory Bird Rule: the beginning of the end of the Aggregation Theory? Environmental Law News 11:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer, F. R., B. J. Cook, M. C. Gilbert, E. J. Clairain, Jr., and R. D. Smith. 2002. A regional guidebook for applying the hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions of intermontane prairie pothole wetlands in the northern Rocky Mountains. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA, ERDC/EL TR-02-7. Available online at http://www.wes.army.mil/el/wetlands/pdfs/trel02-7.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haukos, D. A. and L. M. Smith. 1994. The importance of playa wetlands to biodiversity of the Southern High Plains. Landscape and Urban Planning 28:83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haukos, D. A. and L. M. Smith. 2003. Past and future impacts of wetland regulations on playa ecology in the Southern Great Plains. Wetlands 23:577–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, D. E. and R. L. Linder. 1986. Spring runoff retention in prairie pothole wetlands. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41:122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrud, H. A., G. L. Krapu, and G. A. Swanson. 1989. Prairie basin wetlands of the Dakotas: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report 85(7.28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkman, L. K., S. W. Golladay, L. LaClaire, and R. Sutter. 1999. Biodiversity in southeastern, seasonally ponded, isolated wetlands: management and policy perspectives for research and conservation. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18:553–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, R. M., S. M. Galatowitsch, and J. R. Tester. 1999. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, S. G. 2003. Isolated wetlands and their functions: an ecological perspective. Wetlands 23:517–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, S. G. and K. C. Vining. 2003. Temporal connectivity in a prairie pothole complex. Wetlands 23:13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, G. A., L. Suloway, A. E. Plocher, F. R. Hutto, J. J. Miner, C. A. Phillips, J. Agarwal, and Y. Lin. 2002. Status and function of isolated wetlands in Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL, USA. Special Publication 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G. E., J. Zedler, B. Mitsch, R. Sharitz, J. Larson, L. Fredrickson, S. Pimm, R. Semlitsch, C. Bohlen, C. Woltemade, M. Hirschfeld, J. Callaway, T. Huffman, T. Bancroft, K. Richter, J. Teal, and the Association of State Wetland Managers. 2000. Brief for Dr. Gene Likens et al. as Amici Curiae on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, No. 99-1178. Submitted by T. D. Searchinger and M. J. Bean, attorneys for Amici Curiae.

  • McAllister, L. S., B. E. Peniston, S. G. Leibowitz, B. Abbruzzese, and J. B. Hyman. 2000. A synoptic assessment for prioritizing wetland restoration efforts to optimize flood attenuation. Wetlands 20:70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands (Third Edition). John Wiley, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. H. and A. G. van der Valk. 2002. The potential role of ducks in wetland seed dispersal. Wetlands 22:170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries. National Research Council Committee on Characterization of Wetlands. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. 2001. Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act. National Research Council Committee on Mitigating Wetland Losses. National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naugle, D. E., R. R. Johnson, M. E. Estey, and K. F. Higgins. 2000. A landscape approach to conserving wetland bird habitat in the prairie pothole region of eastern South Dakota. Wetlands 20:588–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterkamp, W. R. and W. W. Wood. 1987. Playa-lake basins on the Southern High Plains of Texas and New Mexico. Part 1. Hydrologic, geomorphic, and geologic evidence for their development. Geological Society of America Bulletin 99:215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, S. M. 1994. Landscape-level processes and wetland conservation in the southern Appalachian mountains. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 77:321–332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M., J.-P. Rochon, G. Tori, R. Pederson, and T. Moorman. 2001. The SWANCC decision: implications for wetlands and waterfowl. Final Report, Ducks Unlimited. Available online at http:// www.ducks.org/conservation/404_report.asp.

  • Rheinhardt, R. D., M. C. Rheinhardt, and M. M. Brinson. 2002. A regional guidebook for applying the hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions of wet pine flats on mineral soils in the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Vicksburg, MS, USA. ERDC/EL TR-02-9. Available online at http://www.wes.army.mil/el/wetlands/pdfs/trel02-9.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C. J. 2003. Pocosins: hydrologically isolated or integrated wetlands on the landscape? Wetlands 23:563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C. J. and J. W. Gibbons. 1993. Pocosins, Carolina bays, and mountain bogs. p. 257–310. In W. H. Martin, S. G. Boyce, and A. C. Echternacht (eds.) Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Lowland Terrestrial Communities. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberry, D. O. and T. C. Winter. 1997. Dynamics of water-table fluctuations in an upland between two prairie-pothole wetlands in North Dakota. Journal of Hydrology 191:266–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterlund, D. R. and P. W. Adams. 1992. Wildland Watershed Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlising, R. A. and E. L. Saunders. 1982. Quantitative analysis of vegetation at the Richvale vernal pools, California. American Journal of Botany 69:734–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Assessment and Strategy Team [SAST]. 1994. A blueprint for change, part V: Science for floodplain management into the 21st century. Interagency Floodplain Management Review Committee, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R. 2003. Carolina bay wetlands: unique habitats of the southeastern United States. Wetlands 23:550–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R. and C. A. Gresham. 1998. Pocosins and Carolina bays. p. 343–377. In M. G. Messina and W. H. Conner (eds.) Southern Forested Wetlands: Ecology and Management. Lewis Publishers, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M. M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. Wetlands Research Program, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical Report WRP-DE-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. W., A. L. Bryan, Jr., R. F. Lide, and G. M. Smith. 1996. Factors affecting the occurrence and structure of fish assemblages in isolated wetlands of the upper coastal plain, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, R. D. and R. Kral. 1994. The ecology, status, and conservation of two non-alluvial wetland communities in the south Atlantic and eastern Gulf coastal plain, USA. Biological Conservation 68:235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. W. 2003a. Estimated extent of geographically isolated wetlands in selected areas of the United States. Wetlands 23:636–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. W. 2003b. Geographically isolated wetlands of the United States. Wetlands 23:494–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. W., H. C. Bergquist, G. P. DeAlessio, and M. J. Starr. 2002. Geographically isolated wetlands: a preliminary assessment of their characteristics and status in selected areas of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast Region. Hadley, MA, USA. Available online at http://wetlands.fws.gov/Pubs_Reports/isolated/report.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. 1989. Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G. and R. L. Pederson. 2003. The SWANCC decision and its implications for prairie potholes. Wetlands 23:590–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whigham, D. F. and T. E. Jordan. 2003. Isolated wetlands and water quality. Wetlands 23:541–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, T. C. 1989. Hydrologic studies of wetlands in the northern prairie. p. 16–54. In A. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetpands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, T. C. 2001. The concept of hydrologic landscapes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, T. C. and J. W. LaBaugh. 2003. Hydrologic considerations in defining isolated wetlands. Wetlands 23:532–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witham, C. W., E. T. Bauder, D. Belk W. R. Ferren, Jr., and R. Ornduff. 1998. Ecology, Conservation and Management of Vernal Pool Ecosystems—Proceedings from a 1996 Conference. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA, USA. Available online at http://www.cnps.org/vernalpools/contents.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, T. 2000. Nest-site characteristics and brood-habitat selection of redheads: an association between wetland characteristics and success. Wetlands 20:575–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, P. H. 1987. The ecology of southern California vernal pools: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report 85(7.11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, P. H. 2003. Vernal pools and the concept of “isolated wetlands”. Wetlands 23:597–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott G. Leibowitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leibowitz, S.G., Nadeau, T.L. Isolated wetlands: State-of-the-science and future directions. Wetlands 23, 663–684 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0663:IWSAFD]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2003)023[0663:IWSAFD]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation